Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Communication Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alkhazraji, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paolillo, J. G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Acculturation of Immigrants to U.S. Organizations

The Case of Muslim Employees

Khalid Mohammed Alkhazraji

United Arab Emirates University

William L. Gardner, III

Jeanette S. Martin

Joseph G. P. Paolillo

University of Mississippi

Questionnaires from 277 Muslim immigrants revealed that most were more inclined to retain their original national culture for their private and/or social lives than to adopt the U.S. national culture. In contrast, most accepted U.S. organizational cultures. Collectivism, religious beliefs and practices, gender, education, and years lived in the United States related to acculturation to the U.S. national culture; national acculturation, collectivism, and perceived discrepancy in work cultures related to acculturation to U.S. organizational cultures. The practical implications of these findings for managers are discussed along with recommended directions for future research.

Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 2, 217-265 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0893318997112003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
I. I. Varner
The Theoretical Foundation for Intercultural Business Communication: A Conceptual Model
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2000; 37(1): 39 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. S. Martin
Book Reviews : Modern Methods for Business Research. Edited by George A. Marcoulides. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998. 437 pages
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2000; 37(1): 106 - 109.
[PDF]