This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Campbell, K. S. Articles by Shane, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Preferred Strategies for Responding to Hostile Questions in Environmental Public Meetings

Saroya I. Follender

Guy Shane

Air Force Institute of Technology

Current guidance for organizational spokespersons lacks a clear theoretical and empirical foundation. This article describes a study designed to rank preferences for five previously identified rhetorical strategies for responding to hostile questions in environmental public meetings based on speech act theory. Responses based on the timing strategy (i.e., claiming that the questioner's request already has been addressed) were most preferred, whereas those based on the agency strategy (i.e., claiming that some other agent is responsible) were least preferred. In addition, some responses based on the desirability strategy (i.e., providing reasons that the questioner actually does not want his or her request fulfilled) were as preferred as those based on the timing strategy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?