Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Communication Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kassing, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Someone’s Going to Hear about This

Examining the Association between Dissent-Triggering Events and Employees’ Dissent Expression

Jeffrey W. Kassing

Todd A. Armstrong

Arizona State University West

The purpose of this study was to examine how the nature of dissenttriggering events influenced to whom employees chose to express dissent. This was accomplished by asking respondents to report the frequency with which they expressed upward dissent to managers and supervisors, lateral dissent to coworkers, and displaced dissent to people external to their organizations (i.e., family and nonwork friends) in response to different dissent-triggering events. Structural equation models were employed. Results revealed that employeeswere more likely to express dissent to supervisors and coworkers about issues related to their coworkers and about organizational functions such as decision making and organizational change than they were to express dissent about ethical practices and preventing harm to employees. Employees did not appear to differentiate the amount of dissent they expressed to people outside of their organizations as a function of dissent-triggering events.

Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 1, 39-65 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0893318902161002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. W. Kassing
Breaking the Chain of Command: Making Sense of Employee Circumvention
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2009; 46(3): 311 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. W. Kassing
"In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time": An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2009; 22(3): 416 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
W. De Maria
Whistleblowers and Organizational Protesters: Crossing Imaginary Borders
Current Sociology, November 1, 2008; 56(6): 865 - 883.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. W. Kassing
Going Around the Boss: Exploring the Consequences of Circumvention
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2007; 21(1): 55 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]