Management Communication Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coombs, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Holladay, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, 165-186 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/089331802237233

Helping Crisis Managers Protect Reputational Assets

Initial Tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory

W. Timothy Coombs

Sherry J. Holladay

Eastern Illinois University

A situational crisis communication theory (SCCT), which articulates the variables, assumptions, and relationships that should be considered in selecting crisis response strategies to protect an organization’s reputation, is advanced. Although various studies taking a situational approach have touched on certain of the theory’s variables and relationships, this study represents the first attempt to articulate and begin to test a situational theory of crisis communication. SCCT is premised on matching the crisis response to the level of crisis responsibility attributed to a crisis. The study explores one of the basic assumptions of SCCT by assessing whether the predicted correlational relationship between crisis responsibility and organizational reputation occurs across a range of crisis types. Results support the theory’s predictions and suggest ways to refine the theory.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
L. P. Wooten and E. H. James
Linking Crisis Management and Leadership Competencies: The Role of Human Resource Development
Advances in Developing Human Resources, June 1, 2008; 10(3): 352 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
J. Brockner and E. H. James
Toward an Understanding of When Executives See Crisis as Opportunity
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2008; 44(1): 94 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
E. A. Hamilton
An Exploration of the Relationship Between Loss of Legitimacy and the Sudden Death of Organizations
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2006; 31(3): 327 - 358.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
M. C. Bligh, J. C. Kohles, and R. Pillai
Crisis and Charisma in the California Recall Election
Leadership, September 1, 2005; 1(3): 323 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
W. T. Coombs
Impact of Past Crises on Current Crisis Communication: Insights From Situational Crisis Communication Theory
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2004; 41(3): 265 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]