Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Communication Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broome, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keever, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Next Generation Group Facilitation

Proposed Principles

Benjamin J. Broome

George Mason University

David B. Keever

George Mason University

This article suggests that the effectiveness of group problem solving using facilitated processes appears to have reached an intellectual and methodological plateau. The time has come to move our thinking about group facilitation research and practice beyond this "plateau." Warfield's (1986) Domain of Science Model is seen as providing the appropriate frame from which to construct a new set of principles for group facilitation. These principles are set forth for designing an approach to facilitation of communication in problem-solving groups that is appropriate for dealing with the increasingly complex problems characteristic of today's organizations.

Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 1, 107-127 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0893318989003001007
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
B. J. Broome and L. Fulbright
A Multistage Influence Model of Barriers to Group Problem Solving: A Participant-Generated Agenda for Small Group Research
Small Group Research, February 1, 1995; 26(1): 25 - 55.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
V. K. Clawson, R. P. Bostrom, and R. Anson
The Role of the Facilitator in Computer-Supported Meetings
Small Group Research, November 1, 1993; 24(4): 547 - 565.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
B. J. Broome and M. Chen
Guidelines For Computer-Assisted Group Problem Solving: Meeting the Challenges of Complex Issues
Small Group Research, May 1, 1992; 23(2): 216 - 236.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
P. H. Andrews
Sex and Gender Differences in Group Communication: Impact on the Facilitation Process
Small Group Research, February 1, 1992; 23(1): 74 - 94.
[Abstract]