This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Steinfield, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Computer-Mediated Communications in Organizational Settings

Emerging Conceptual Frameworks and Directions for Research

Michigan State University

Much of the research on communication media in organizations was and still is guided by a dominant paradigm emanating from contingency theory. It is argued that the contingency theory paradigm has proven to be inadequate, not only because of a wide range of anomalous empirical findings, but also because it has led to a limited view of computer-mediated communications (CMC) that constrains the creative application of this set of communication technologies. Two new theoretical approaches, critical mass and social influence models, are described that focus on the social context in which the communication technologies are embedded as a source of explanation for adoption, use, and impact. Finally, three avenues for extending existing theory are suggested: Researchers are encouraged to explore CMC systems as (a) an interorganizational communication medium, (b) one of a set of information services available over a telecommunications infrastructure, and (c) as a tool for achieving strategic organizational objectives and competitive advantage.

Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 3, 348-365 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0893318992005003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Leonard, J. R. Van Scotter, and F. Pakdil Culture and Communication: Cultural Variations and Media Effectiveness Administration Society, November 1, 2009; 41(7): 850 - 877. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. WALTHER, C. L. SLOVACEK, and L. C. TIDWELL Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?: Photographic Images in Long-Term and Short-Term Computer-Mediated Communication Communication Research, February 1, 2001; 28(1): 105 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. BOCZKOWSKI Understanding the Development of Online Newspapers: Using Computer-Mediated Communication Theorizing to Study Internet Publishing New Media Society, April 1, 1999; 1(1): 101 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C.B. Crawford and C. S. Strohkirch Influence Methods and Innovators: Technocrats and Champions Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, April 1, 1997; 4(2): 43 - 54. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. WALTHER Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction Communication Research, February 1, 1996; 23(1): 3 - 43. [Abstract]

				J. B. WALTHER, J. F. ANDERSON, and D. W. PARK Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Meta-Analysis of Social and Antisocial Communication Communication Research, August 1, 1994; 21(4): 460 - 487. [Abstract]

				P. Sullivan Research Design Issues for the Study of Electronic Discussions Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1993; 56(2): 43 - 45. [PDF]

				C. Steinfield Book Review Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1992; 6(2): 204 - 213.