Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Communication Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Teamwork and Communication

A 3-Year Case Study of Change

Susan R. Glaser

University of Oregon

This 3-year research project assessed the effectiveness of a teambuilding intervention among a group of department leaders who supervised a fire management unit working in the forests of the western United States. The intervention began with a 3-day retreat that covered three basic areas: communication skills, consensus building, and collaborative problem solving. Four months later, a 1-day follow-up session was held, and 6 months after that, another 3-day retreat. For each of the following 2 years, every team member was again interviewed, and a 2-day follow-up session was held. Researchers conducted interviews prior to the intervention and each of the follow-up sessions. Three years after the intervention began, group members reported substantial improvement in their teamwork including: (a) an increase in the ability to raise issues and manage conflict, (b) an increase in mutual praise, support, and cooperation, (c) clarification of roles and responsibilities, and (d) long-term commitment to teamwork and innovation.

Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3, 282-296 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0893318994007003003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
P. R. Gamble and C. E. Kelliher
Imparting Information and Influencing Behaviour: An Examination of Staff Briefing Sessions
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 1999; 36(3): 261 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. A. Kolb
Let's Bring Structure Back: A Commentary
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 1996; 9(4): 452 - 465.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
W. A. Haskins
Freedom of Speech: Construct for Creating a Culture Which Empowers Organizational Members
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 1996; 33(1): 85 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
M. L. Tucker, K. S. Powell, and G. Dale Meyer
Qualitative Research in Business Communication: A Review and Analysis
Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 1995; 32(4): 383 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
S. Zamanou and S. R. Glaser
Moving toward Participation and Involvement: Managing and Measuring Organizational Culture
Group Organization Management, December 1, 1994; 19(4): 475 - 502.
[Abstract]