Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Communication Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russ, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lengel, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Media Selection and Managerial Characteristics in Organizational Communications

Gail S. Russ

Illinois State University

Richard L. Daft

Vanderbilt University

Robert H. Lengel

University of Texas at San Antonio

The media richness model and the symbolic interactionist perspective are the basis for hypotheses about managerial communication patterns. The hypothesized relationships are tested with data from 94 managers. The results indicate that managers tend to select the face-to-face medium for highly equivocal communications and written media for clear, objective communications. This relationship is stronger for managers with higher level positions and higher performance evaluations, and is not significantly affected by managerial educational level, organizational tenure, sender/receiver orientation, or introversion/extraversion. The implications of the findings for organization design, communications, and manager performance are discussed.

Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 2, 151-175 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0893318990004002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
M. E. Gordon and L. P. Stewart
Conversing About Performance: Discursive Resources for the Appraisal Interview
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2009; 22(3): 473 - 501.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
S. C. D'Urso and S. A. Rains
Examining the Scope of Channel Expansion: A Test of Channel Expansion Theory With New and Traditional Communication Media
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 21(4): 486 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. W. Turner and N. L. Reinsch Jr.
The Business Communicator as Presence Allocator: Multicommunicating, Equivocality, and Status at Work
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2007; 44(1): 36 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. W. Turner, J. A. Grube, C. H. Tinsley, C. Lee, and C. O'Pell
Exploring the Dominant Media: How Does Media Use Reflect Organizational Norms and Affect Performance?
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2006; 43(3): 220 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
A. J. Flanagin and J. H. Waldeck
Technology Use and Organizational Newcomer Socialization
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2004; 41(2): 137 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
C. E. Timmerman
Media Selection During The Implementation Of Planned Organizational Change: A Predictive Framework Based on Implementation Approach and Phase
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2003; 16(3): 301 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. Lee and R. L. Heath
Managerial Media Selection and Information Evaluation from the Receiver's Perspective in Decision-Making Contexts
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1999; 13(1): 76 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
P. R. Gamble and C. E. Kelliher
Imparting Information and Influencing Behaviour: An Examination of Staff Briefing Sessions
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 1999; 36(3): 261 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
B. Donabedian, S. M. McKinnon, and W. J. Bruns Jr.
Task Characteristics, Managerial Socialization, and Media Selection
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1998; 11(3): 372 - 400.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
C.B. Crawford and C. S. Strohkirch
Influence Methods and Innovators: Technocrats and Champions
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, April 1, 1997; 4(2): 43 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
E. W. Christensen and J. R. Bailey
A Source Accessibility Effect on Media Selection
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1997; 10(3): 373 - 387.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. L. Jankovich and K. S. Powell
An Implementation Model for a Communication Across the Curriculum Program
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1997; 60(2): 9 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
N. L. Reinsch Jr and A. N. Shelby
What Communication Abilities Do Practitioners Need? Evidence from MBA Students
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1997; 60(4): 7 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. M. Whitfield, B. T. Lamont, and V. Sambamurthy
The Effects of Organization Design on Media Richness in Multinational Enterprises
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1996; 10(2): 209 - 226.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
Linlin Ku
Social and Nonsocial Uses of Electronic Messaging Systems in Organizations
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 1996; 33(3): 297 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
L. Reinsch Jr and A. N. Shelby
Communication Challenges and Needs: Perceptions of MBA Students
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1996; 59(1): 36 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
S. J. Nelson, S. Moncada, and D. C. Smith
Written Language Skills of Entry-Level Accountants as Assessed by Experienced CPAs
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1996; 59(4): 122 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
F. Sligo
Information Loss Revisited: How Different Levels of Staff Perceive Their Access to Work-related Knowledge
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, September 1, 1995; 33(1): 60 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
W. L. Gardner III and D. E. Gundersen
Information System Training, Usage, and Satisfaction: An Exploratory Study of the Hospitality Industry
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1995; 9(1): 78 - 114.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
N. L. REINSCH JR. and R. W. BESWICK
Preferences for Sending Word-Processed versus Handwritten Messages: An Exploratory Study
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 1995; 9(1): 42 - 62.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. Rymer
Using Qualitative Research to Generate Theory
Business Communication Quarterly, September 1, 1993; 56(3): 42 - 44.
[PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
R. E. Rice, S.-J. Chang, and J. Torobin
Communicator Style, Media Use, Organizational Level, and Use and Evaluation of Electronic Messaging
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1992; 6(1): 3 - 33.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
G. L. ZAHN
Face-to-Face Communication in an Office Setting: The Effects of Position, Proximity, and Exposure
Communication Research, December 1, 1991; 18(6): 737 - 754.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. Barnard
The Information Environments of New Managers
Journal of Business Communication, September 1, 1991; 28(4): 312 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. SCHMITZ and J. FULK
Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail: A Test of the Social Influence Model of Technology Use
Communication Research, August 1, 1991; 18(4): 487 - 523.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. Fulk and B. Boyd
Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations
Journal of Management, June 1, 1991; 17(2): 407 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
S. H. Komsky
A Profile of Users of Electronic Mail in a University: Frequent Versus Occasional Users
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1991; 4(3): 310 - 340.
[Abstract]